@Paul — no. "#" is the top of the page. "#one thing" could possibly be a unique part of the web page, but # on your own is the top.

You already know this. I do not Assume there's much more to say about that subject. Needless to say, distinctive individuals have unique levels of deviation with the prescribed normal and tolerance for these deviations by Others.

"Ungrammatical" is just not rather well-described during the sense it's Employed in that quotation. If your creator just meant that "Here are the main points" is preferable when writing for publication, I agree.

How to make reference to the last of more than two aspects in a list without having reiterating the names? Very hot Network Concerns

So truly, neither a single of your sentences is correct. You can not have two informations; it will not make any sense. Maybe you mean "two items

EpanouiEpanoui one,8961212 silver badges1313 bronze badges three 3 In the event the connection will likely be public—say, over a website such as this one, as opposed to within an e-mail—please refrain from employing "This connection" or "Click here" or "Hyperlink" since the link text. It can make it more complicated for those who use monitor readers to discover the target.

I do not find out about you, but I generally obtain myself pointing from the way of the thing staying mentioned e.g. "The lift/elevator is about there on the proper"

This can also be witnessed by The point that most know-how base posts not often say "Adhere to the link" although The majority of them normally say "Discover more", "Read more", "See more", etc.

Ngram textbooks.google.com/ngrams/… demonstrates that "to know more" was more preferred than "for more information" nearly 1987. Sorry, I do not understand how to set back links in comments.

Why wasn't freezing Kane considered a viable option from the Nostromo crew for working with the facehugger in "Alien"?

Concurrently it provides a gentle challenge: nobody likes to confess that nearly anything is unachievable—Until, obviously, it truly is

Polite phrase or short phrase that means "this is not a superior more than enough priority for us to operate on now" one

I do not seriously see The purpose in attaching unique labels in classic and modern day established-ups. Because at the end of the day, no "rule" (within the scientific feeling from the term) is really broken; we merely change terminologies with no risking shedding The larger picture. Or it could be that I'm mistaken. :)

You are augmenting your generic digicam definition with information particular to the Nikon. In the event you vidéos sexy stars françaises ended up producing a spec you'd be fleshing it out (as Cesar states), and when you were being producing an outline you would be refining it (as User19148 states).